Gibrat's law — the modern finding that firm growth rates are independent of firm size, which generates the Pareto (power-law) distribution of firm sizes seen in every industrial economy — is here tested two thousand years early. Roman brickyards (figlinae) stamped their…
Generated by Fable · below the evidence/publication boundary
One Thousand and One Conjectures
One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.
1,107 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 843 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 0 provisional · 15 resolved (6 supported / 4 killed)
Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 843 anticipated but never tested, 50 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.
The conjectures are a public preview of a much larger inference project, coming shortly.
Why these conjectures matter — the account, written by the model under examination → · The noetome, measured: gradient, quadrant map & the corpus judging itself → · The Most-Wanted 52 →
Filter
Clear all filtersMore ways to slice
Specialist axes — method, instrument, provenance and more.
What the tags mean
- Supported — a registered prediction held up in data
- Falsified — a registered prediction was refuted
- Inconclusive — a registered prediction resolved without a clean verdict either way
- Open to kill — untested — no decisive result yet; the site’s invitation, not a verdict
- Already answered — the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
- Anticipated — the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run
- No prior located — a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
- testable — a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
- Shepherd-triaged — an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
- provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending — an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
- awaiting prior-art check — hunt open — no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Showing 1–4 of 4 matching conjectures.
Among the ostraka cast against Themistocles, a famous deposit of 190 sherds turned out to have been inscribed by just a few hands — prepared ballots, evidently readied for distribution to voters. The conjecture generalizes this find into a testable model of…
The walls of Pompeii preserve genuine written conversations: graffiti that answer, mock, and extend earlier graffiti on the same surface, recorded in CIL IV. Modern online forums show a robust statistical signature in how such exchanges unfold — the distribution of reply…
Joins modern campaign geography to Pompeian electoral epigraphy. Political scientists mapping yard signs and canvassing find both decay with distance from the candidate's home, because campaigns run on the candidate's own network of neighbours, clients, and friends, and that network is spatially…