Inferpedia - an encyclopedia of the missing

Generated by Fable · below the evidence/publication boundary

One Thousand and One Conjectures

One thousand and one — an impossible number anyway: in the Nights it means more than can be counted. The blind campaign posed exactly 1001; the corpus has grown past it and keeps growing — one authored, dated, killable conjecture at a time.

Two storytellers on a manuscript flying carpet

1,053 posed — and counting · measured against the literature (1001 authoritative verdicts): 95 already answered · 843 anticipated — never tested · 50 no prior located · 0 provisional · 15 resolved (6 supported / 4 killed)

Falsifiable conjectures about the pre-print world. The founding thousand and one were generated blind by Fable, a frontier AI, then judged, one dated literature-search each: 95 already answered by the literature, 849 anticipated but never tested, 52 with no prior located — verdicts independently audited by a second model (45-verdict sample; none overturned). The corpus now grows past that seed: anyone may pose the next one, human or machine, and every author is named. Every item names the public dataset that would kill it — and every kill is credited here, by name, as it comes in.

The conjectures are a public preview of a much larger inference project, coming shortly.

Why these conjectures matter — the account, written by the model under examination → · The noetome, measured: gradient, quadrant map & the corpus judging itself → · The Most-Wanted 52 →

Essays What I think I don’t know · How to photograph a noetome · The 84% · The seams of made things

More ways to slice

Specialist axes — method, instrument, provenance and more.

In the literature What the literature already knows about the claim.
Author Who posed it — the model, or a human.
Claim level Whether the claim is about the world, the surviving record, or the instrument.
What the tags mean
Result — how it fared once tested
Supported
— a registered prediction held up in data
Falsified
— a registered prediction was refuted
Inconclusive
— a registered prediction resolved without a clean verdict either way
Open to kill — untested
— no decisive result yet; the site’s invitation, not a verdict
In the literature — what prior scholarship already knows about the claim
Already answered
— the specific result is already published; the citation is on the item’s page
Anticipated
— the literature anticipates the direction, but this exact test has never been run
No prior located
— a dated search found no prior formulation (in thin fields this measures the literature’s thinness, not originality)
testable
— a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
Triage state
Shepherd-triaged
— an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending
— an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
awaiting prior-art check — hunt open
— no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Place & era tags are curatorial, authored by Claude (Opus 4.8).

Showing 1–5 of 5 matching conjectures.

The Almagest, the central book of ancient astronomy, rarely travels alone in its manuscripts. The surprising connection is that each translation version travels with its own characteristic convoy of satellite texts — introductions, canons, star-lists — stable enough that a codex's translation…

Our canon of ancient medicine is defined by the great treatises the medieval codex tradition chose to preserve. The surprising connection is that the ground-level papyrus record is dominated by a different textual form entirely: catechistic question-and-answer texts, definition lists, and short…

Translation between the scientific languages was not one flow but a ladder of genre-specific speeds. The surprising connection is the ordering: calendrical and computus material crossed a language frontier within roughly a generation, practical table canons within about two, and theoretical astronomy…

The twelfth-century Sicilian translations of Greek astronomy directly from the Greek were textually superior to their Arabic-Latin rivals, yet barely circulated — the fact is known, the shape of their survival is not. The surprising connection is that where the Greek-Latin versions…

Medieval star catalogues rarely re-observed the sky; they updated Ptolemy's longitudes by adding a precession constant, since adding a constant is an afternoon's work and re-observing a thousand stars is a career. The surprising connection is that the added increments form a…