AI-generated conjecture · below the evidence/publication boundary
← All conjectures · Texts, scribes & transmission
Cunmu kills poets, not doctors
Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).
Claim (verbatim)
Cunmu kills poets, not doctors. The Siku quanshu zongmu's two-tier structure — titles copied into the imperial library versus cunmu, listed but not transcribed — is a natural experiment on which genres lived by state canonization and which by private demand. Being left out of the imperial transcription mattered only where the empire was the marginal reader: minor authors' literary collections had no constituency but prestige culture, so cunmu relegation was a slow death sentence; medical, agricultural, and divinatory books had buyers who never cared what the Four Treasuries thought.
Prediction clause (verbatim)
Sample cunmu titles from the zongmu in two strata — bieji (individual literary collections) and practical arts (medicine, agronomy, shushu) — and trace each in modern union catalogues of extant old editions. Primary clause (verdict follows it): the extant-today share of cunmu practical-arts titles exceeds the extant share of cunmu bieji by at least 20 percentage points. Secondary: among fully transcribed (zhulu) titles the between-genre survival gap is under 10 points — the catalogue tier interacts with genre, which a uniform-decay account cannot produce.
Kill-dataset (verbatim)
Kill: the Siku quanshu zongmu (digitized, including on Kanripo) crossed with the published Zhongguo guji shanben shumu and the online Zhongguo guji zongmu union records.
Provenance
Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5
Generated by a fresh Fable-tier instance (claude-fable-5) at maximum effort with generation-first blindness (no repo reads, no web searches, no DB queries); 248-title list supplied at launch, titles only, no verdicts/dossiers seen; prompt pre-committed in docs/generated/conjectures_1001_wave_ledger.md and docs/generated/conjecture_fresh_fable_w04_prompt_20260708.txt. Wave W04 of docs/GOAL_CONJECTURES_1001_CAMPAIGN_20260708.md. Novelty unverified by construction. An output-token limit interrupted the first response turn before any tool call was made; the packet was still produced in a single Write with no information ingress.
Novelty / leakage triage
provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending
A provisional first pass authored by the model (Opus), not yet confirmed by the shepherd. It carries the same dated-search requirements as an authoritative verdict but is excluded from every headline figure and cannot underwrite a prediction until a shepherd confirms it. Provisional reading: Adjacent (closely related prior work exists).
The instrument is textbook: the Siku quanshu zongmu's two-tier structure -- 3,461 titles copied into the imperial library (zhulu) versus 6,793 listed by title only (cunmu, 'extant but unchecked') -- is a standard object of Qing bibliographical study. Not located: the item's specific genre-by-tier survival interaction -- the extant-today share of cunmu practical-arts titles (medicine, agronomy, shushu) exceeding that of cunmu bieji by >=20 points while the same genre gap among zhulu titles stays under 10 points, traced through the Zhongguo guji shanben shumu / Zhongguo guji zongmu union records. A uniform-decay account cannot produce the interaction; the catalogue tier as a differential survival filter by genre is an unrun operationalization.
- Siku Quanshu Zongmu Tiyao -- the zhulu (copied) vs cunmu (listed only) two-tier structure, 3,461 + 6,793 works (overview) — The catalogue's two tiers; the genre-conditioned survival interaction is the unrun measurement
- Zhongguo guji shanben shumu and the Zhongguo guji zongmu union catalogue of extant old editions — The kill dataset for tracing cunmu titles' survival by genre
Predictions
No prediction registered yet.
Weigh in
No community feedback yet.
Add your take
Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.