AI-generated conjecture · below the evidence/publication boundary
← All conjectures · Texts, scribes & transmission
The extracted chapter drifts
Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).
Claim (verbatim)
The extracted chapter drifts. The Guanshiyin pumen pin circulated both inside full Lotus Sutra copies and as a standalone apotropaic booklet. Inside the Lotus, a copyist works from full-canon exemplars under sutra-copying discipline and proofreading chains; the standalone charm-text is copied from whatever single sheet came to hand, for immediate protective use, outside any audit. Extraction removes the canonical anchor, so the same words should measurably drift faster once they travel alone — textual stability as a property of codicological company, not of the words themselves.
Prediction clause (verbatim)
Collate Dunhuang witnesses of the Pumen chapter in two classes — embedded in multi-chapter Lotus copies versus codicologically standalone — against T 262 chapter 25. Primary clause (verdict follows it): variant density (substitutions plus omissions per 1,000 graphs) in standalone copies exceeds embedded copies by at least 50 percent. Secondary: the standalone class has the heavier tail — its 90th-percentile copy diverges at three times the embedded 90th percentile.
Kill-dataset (verbatim)
Kill: IDP-catalogued Lotus Sutra and standalone Guanyin-chapter manuscripts from Dunhuang (the most numerous text group in Cave 17), collated against CBETA T 262. Resolvable against IDP plus CBETA.
Provenance
Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5
Generated by a fresh Fable-tier instance (claude-fable-5) at maximum effort with generation-first blindness (no repo reads, no web searches, no DB queries); 248-title list supplied at launch, titles only, no verdicts/dossiers seen; prompt pre-committed in docs/generated/conjectures_1001_wave_ledger.md and docs/generated/conjecture_fresh_fable_w04_prompt_20260708.txt. Wave W04 of docs/GOAL_CONJECTURES_1001_CAMPAIGN_20260708.md. Novelty unverified by construction. An output-token limit interrupted the first response turn before any tool call was made; the packet was still produced in a single Write with no information ingress.
Novelty / leakage triage
provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending
A provisional first pass authored by the model (Opus), not yet confirmed by the shepherd. It carries the same dated-search requirements as an authoritative verdict but is excluded from every headline figure and cannot underwrite a prediction until a shepherd confirms it. Provisional reading: Adjacent (closely related prior work exists).
The premise is documented: the Guanshiyin pumen pin (Lotus ch. 25) circulated both embedded in full Lotus copies and as the standalone Guanyin jing / Pumen jing, and Dunhuang preserves both classes in bulk (on the order of 128 individual Guanyin-chapter copies against ~860 Lotus copies) -- the standalone apotropaic booklet copied outside canonical proofreading chains. Not located: the item's specific differential-drift measurement -- variant density in standalone copies exceeding embedded copies by >=50%, with a heavier 90th-percentile tail -- collated against CBETA T 262 ch. 25. The standalone circulation and its uncontrolled copying are recognized; 'extraction accelerates textual drift' as an executed comparison for this text is unrun.
- Chun-fang Yu, Kuan-yin: The Chinese Transformation of Avalokitesvara (Columbia University Press, 2001) -- the separate circulation of the Pumen chapter as the Guanyin jing — The standalone-vs-embedded circulation of the Guanyin chapter; the differential-drift measurement is unrun
- IDP-catalogued Dunhuang Lotus and standalone Guanyin-chapter manuscripts collated against CBETA T 262 — The kill dataset for the standalone-vs-embedded variant-density comparison
Predictions
No prediction registered yet.
Weigh in
No community feedback yet.
Add your take
Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.