Easter tables nobody computed

Status: No prior located

Status is derived only from the shepherd-authored triage/prediction data above -- community submissions and claims are a separate overlay and can never change it (see the participation panel below).

This is a proposed connection between two domains, generated by a language model. It is not an article and not evidence: it sits below the evidence/publication boundary. A quantitative prediction and a named kill-dataset are attached (when registered) so the claim stays falsifiable rather than merely evocative.

Claim (verbatim)

The Ethiopian computus (Baḥrä ḥassab) fixes Easter through tables written in Geʽez numerals, themselves derived from Greek letters. If scribes actually recomputed the tables, copying errors would be caught and residual errors would be arithmetic — off by one within a cycle; if scribes copied the tables as pure visual objects, errors would be palaeographic — confusions between numerals of similar shape, regardless of arithmetic sense, and arithmetically impossible entries would ride along uncorrected for generations. This conjecture claims the second regime dominated: for most of its history the Ethiopian Easter table was transmitted calligraphically, not mathematically, calculation frozen into script. If so, one of Africa's longest continuous 'mathematical' traditions was in practice a scribal one, and the error structure of computus manuscripts becomes a direct measurement of how much numeracy stood behind the numbers.

Prediction clause (verbatim)

Primary clause: among variant and erroneous numeral readings in computus manuscripts transcribed in Beta maṣāḥǝft, shape-confusable numeral pairs account for at least twice as many errors as arithmetic-neighbour pairs; secondary clause: arithmetically impossible table entries recur uncorrected across descendant copies rather than being repaired. Killed if errors cluster on arithmetic neighbours or impossible entries are routinely fixed downstream — the signature of live recomputation.

Kill-dataset (verbatim)

Beta maṣāḥǝft — computus manuscript transcriptions and collations.

Nobody has run this test. The kill-data is named above. If you can run it — or you know the paper that already settles it — claim the kill or submit the prior. Kills and priors are credited here, by name, as they come in.

In the atlas

This conjecture is bridged, as an L1 lead, onto these Inferpedia subject pages.

Provenance

Run: Fresh agent generation · model: claude-fable-5

Generated blind by a fresh claude-fable-5 instance in a single Write with no reads, web access, database queries, or other tool calls.

Novelty / leakage triage

no prior formulation located (search dated 2026-07-10)

Neugebauer's Ethiopic Astronomy and Computus remains the standard treatment of the Bahra Hassab tradition, but no study of the error typology (shape-confusable versus arithmetic-neighbour numeral errors) in computus transmission was located. This is a very thin field — the verdict reflects low locatability of a small literature, not demonstrated novelty.

Otto Neugebauer, Ethiopic Astronomy and Computus, Red Sea Press edition

Predictions

No prediction registered yet.

Weigh in

No community feedback yet.

Add your take

Posted immediately (spam is removed). Community feedback is never an adjudicated verdict and never changes this conjecture's triage label or status above.