Small Syrmia settlement-history trace inferon

Epistemic status

Inferred L3 evidence-packet article.

This article describes an entity that is not directly attested. It is an inference from the evidence listed below.

Summary

Source-backed inferon that premodern Syrmia village histories survive as sparse charter, monastery-estate, and Ottoman-register traces.

What is being inferred

Small Syrmia settlement-history trace inferon is treated here only as the inferred lacuna described by the candidate record and the evidence packet below.

What is attested

• Evidence 1797 records: Pecinci local history gives medieval mentions for Asanja, Dec, and Brestac and places them in later Ottoman nahiye or sanjak context.
• Evidence 1798 records: Irig municipal pages give early mentions for settlements including Neradin and Rivica in the same regional settlement-history seam.
• Evidence 1799 records: The Irig Rivica page contributes local official context for sparse settlement-history traces in the microregion.
• Evidence 1800 records: The Krusedol Prnjavor page ties settlement formation to the 1509-1512 monastery build and estate labor, supporting monastery-estate settlement traces.
• Evidence 1801 records: Grgeteg and Krusedol material shows monastery foundations and estates as plausible settlement-forming institutions in the microregion.
• Evidence 1802 records: The Srem reference entry provides regional historical context for interpreting the sparse local settlement notices.
• Evidence 4383 records: Offline judge treated existing inferon 257 (source_dependence) as support for Small Syrmia settlement-history trace inferon. Evidence strength: bounded but below-publication structural/source inferon; sufficient for L2 review, not for article promotion. The accountable path is EvidencePath 1412.

Why infer this entity

AI-assessed L2 Quotient triage: AI judge warrant assessment for L2 Quotient triage; existing AI-created evidence remains below publication.

Evidence ledger

• Evidence 1797: Pecinci, local history, local history. Pecinci local history gives medieval mentions for Asanja, Dec, and Brestac and places them in later Ottoman nahiye or sanjak context. Role: Supporting evidence.
• Evidence 1798: Irig municipal settlement page, Neradin, municipal settlement page. Irig municipal pages give early mentions for settlements including Neradin and Rivica in the same regional settlement-history seam. Role: Supporting evidence.
• Evidence 1799: Irig municipal settlement page, Rivica, municipal settlement page. The Irig Rivica page contributes local official context for sparse settlement-history traces in the microregion. Role: Supporting evidence.
• Evidence 1800: Irig municipal settlement page, Krusedol Prnjavor, municipal settlement page. The Krusedol Prnjavor page ties settlement formation to the 1509-1512 monastery build and estate labor, supporting monastery-estate settlement traces. Role: Supporting evidence.
• Evidence 1801: Vojvodina Travel, Grgeteg Monastery, regional cultural page. Grgeteg and Krusedol material shows monastery foundations and estates as plausible settlement-forming institutions in the microregion. Role: Supporting evidence.
• Evidence 1802: Islam Ansiklopedisi, Srem, specialist reference. The Srem reference entry provides regional historical context for interpreting the sparse local settlement notices. Role: Bibliographic control.
• Evidence 4383: Offline existing-inferon judge ledger control source, existing_inferon_judge_promote:inferon:257. Offline judge treated existing inferon 257 (source_dependence) as support for Small Syrmia settlement-history trace inferon. Evidence strength: bounded but below-publication structural/source inferon; sufficient for L2 review, not for article promotion. The accountable path is EvidencePath 1412. Role: Noetic interpretation.

Counterarguments

• The packet contains no separate counterevidence item; this absence does not remove the need for challenge.

Confidence scores

• Direct attestation: 15
• Existence warrant: 60
• Specificity confidence: 58
• Reconstruction dependence: 70
• Counterevidence pressure: 0

What would change the score

• A direct attestation would move this out of the inferred catalogue.
• Stronger independent evidence would raise the warrant or specificity.
• Better counterevidence would lower the warrant or force retirement.