Source layer behind the Book of Jashar poetic citations
An inferred poetic or archival source layer behind the biblical citations of the Book of Jashar in Joshua and Samuel.
L4 Draft articles and reviews
Source layer behind the Book of Jashar poetic citations v1 ยท Draft
A repeated named-source trace behind Joshua and Samuel.
This article describes an entity that is not directly attested as an extant recoverable work; it is inferred from source-citation traces and should not be read as ordinary documentation of a surviving text.
Epistemic status
Draft article. The Book of Jashar is named in biblical source formulae, but the recoverable source layer remains inferred and non-extant.
Summary
Joshua 10:13 and 2 Samuel 1:18 both point to the Book of Jashar. Inferpedia treats the missing object here as the source layer behind those poetic citations rather than as a reconstructed book.
What is being inferred
The inferred entity is a poetic, archival, or source-memory layer behind the Jashar references. The current evidence does not establish its extent, date, genre, or internal contents.
What is attested
Two primary biblical loci preserve the title or source label. That gives stronger warrant than a single isolated reference.
Why infer this entity
Repeated named-source formulae are meaningful traces of textual dependence or source memory. They justify a draft article while requiring conservative specificity.
Evidence ledger
- E1, Joshua 10:13: primary trace for a Book of Jashar citation.
- E2, 2 Samuel 1:18: second primary trace for the same named source label.
Counterarguments
The phrase could be a conventional citation label, a later editorial signal, or a source-memory label rather than one stable book-like work.
Confidence scores
Direct attestation: 58. Existence warrant: 78. Specificity: 58. Reconstruction dependence: 80. Counterevidence: 16.
What would change the score
A philological study of the Jashar formula, manuscript variants, or a convincing explanation that the two citations are not independent traces would change the warrant.
Why this candidate exists
Codex-native traversal from Category:Judaism to Category:Hebrew Bible selected a repeated named-source citation suitable for bounded source reading.
L3 Evidence packet
Bible (King James), Joshua 10 - Indirect reference
Warrant role: Primary trace
Source authority: Primary source 80
Access level: Full text
Locator: Joshua 10:13
Quote: "written in the book of Jasher"
Paraphrase: Joshua preserves a named source formula for the Book of Jashar.
Reliability: 80 - Relevance: 88
Cluster: jashar-source-formula
Bible (King James), 2 Samuel 1 - Indirect reference
Warrant role: Primary trace
Source authority: Primary source 80
Access level: Full text
Locator: 2 Samuel 1:18
Quote: "written in the book of Jasher"
Paraphrase: 2 Samuel provides an additional primary trace for a Book of Jashar citation.
Reliability: 80 - Relevance: 88
Cluster: jashar-source-formula
Offline existing-inferon judge ledger control source - Network gap
Warrant role: Noetic interpretation
Source authority: Noetic model prior 50
Access level: No external text
Locator: existing_inferon_judge_promote:inferon:300
Paraphrase: Offline judge treated existing inferon 300 (source_dependence) as support for Source layer behind the Book of Jashar poetic citations. Evidence strength: source-backed prior reading already isolated a bounded missing or reconstructed entity; suitable for L2 only. The accountable path is EvidencePath 1517.
Reliability: 78 - Relevance: 66
Cluster: existing_inferon_judge_promote:211f7d3c38f639e443b67453fd20623c
Arguments
Existing inferon 300 supports an L2 inferred candidate for Source layer behind the Book of Jashar poetic citations; this remains below publication and is not direct attestation.
AI-assessed L2 Quotient triage: AI judge warrant assessment for L2 Quotient triage; existing AI-created evidence remains below publication.
A source layer behind the Book of Jashar citations is warranted as a draft entity because two biblical loci preserve the same named-source formula.
Repeated named-source traces make warrant stronger than a single citation, but reconstruction remains limited.