Data collapse from critical phenomena meets manuscript transmission: Greek works at large and Byzantine book epigrams are different genres copied under different incentives, yet their witness-count distributions should collapse onto a single curve after rescaling by the mean, because textual survival has…
Generated by Fable · below the evidence/publication boundary
One Thousand and One Conjectures
308 of 1001 posed · 158 shepherd-triaged · 150 provisional · 0 frontier · 20 predictions · 9 resolved (6 supported / 3 killed) — the 1001st will be posed at Ars Inquirendi, Oxford, 20 November 2026.
Cross-domain conjectures generated noetically by Fable — a frontier AI proposing, from its own knowledge, surprising connections between two well-known domains that it judged likely to be both novel and important. Each pairs a specific claim with a quantitative prediction and a dataset that could prove it wrong; each was then checked against the literature to flag the ones with known priors.
This is one form of lead generation for Inferpedia, the encyclopedia of the missing — and this page is an early preview.
Why these conjectures matter: charting the noetome — its structure, limits & potential →
Nothing here is claimed as verified-novel. Each sits below the evidence/publication boundary: a connection already known in the literature is shown honestly and tagged Prior, and every prediction is registered before it is scored. Spotted a prior yourself? Open any conjecture and weigh in.
Filter
Clear all filtersWhat the tags mean
- Open — no decisive result yet
- Prior — a prior formulation exists in the literature
- Supported — a registered prediction held up in data
- Falsified — a registered prediction was refuted
- testable — a quantitative prediction + kill-dataset is registered
- Shepherd-triaged — an authoritative Fable-authored verdict; shown as the pills above and the only tier in the headline numbers
- provisional — model-triaged, shepherd review pending — an Opus-authored first pass, not yet shepherd-confirmed and excluded from every headline figure
- awaiting prior-art check — hunt open — no triage yet; found a prior yourself? open it and weigh in
Showing 1–8 of 8 matching conjectures.
Genuine Linear B tallies should be Benford-conformal; assessment records (quotas) should deviate — statistically separating what was counted from what was demanded. Falsify: digit distributions by tablet series.
Computational errors in dated horoscopes are inherited from specific copies of astronomical tables — so recomputing surviving horoscopes reconstructs the copy-tree of the tables themselves. Falsify: recompute and cluster.
Oral-epic formulas are redundancy bits: formula density should rise with local information load (names, numbers, catalogs) within Homeric and South Slavic lines. Falsify: corpus regression.
Generalizing the famous 190 Themistocles sherds cut by a few hands: handwriting clusters on ostraka should predict deposit location — ward-level bloc voting, measurable. Falsify: paleographic clustering plus findspots.
His distance errors should grow log-normally with informant hops from the Aegean — rumor as multiplicative noise. Falsify: reported vs true distances.
Joins capture-recapture ecology to Greek philology: works attested by exactly one and exactly two witnesses play the role of singleton and doubleton species, so the Pinakes witness-count table is an ecological sample from which the size of the lost Greek library is…
Joins neutral models of cultural evolution to Byzantine paratexts: if book-epigram copying were preferential attachment, older epigram types would accumulate more occurrences simply by exposure; instead popularity is fixed at birth by intrinsic fit to scribal needs, and age buys almost nothing.